Suzan DelBene D
- View Candidate Profile ›
- Where They Stand on the Issues ›
- Compare the Candidates ›
- Listed by King County Elections
Only eligible, registered voters may vote. Who can vote in Washington. Hours checked Oct. 4, 2026 from official sources.
For voters in Seattle, Bellevue, Kent, Renton, Federal Way, Kirkland, Auburn, Redmond, Shoreline and the rest of King County. Some races depend on where you live; your official sample ballot shows exactly which ones are yours.
King County's lookup asks for your name and date of birth to find your registration, then shows your exact ballot. No login? The countywide sample ballot shows every race in the county. Open the countywide sample ballot.
Only eligible, registered voters may vote. Who can vote in Washington. Hours checked Oct. 4, 2026 from official sources.
Source: Washington Secretary of State
A member of the U.S. House of Representatives for one congressional district. House members vote on federal laws and must start all tax and spending bills. King County is split among four districts; only voters in this district vote in this race.
A member of the U.S. House of Representatives for one congressional district. House members vote on federal laws and must start all tax and spending bills. King County is split among four districts; only voters in this district vote in this race.
A member of the U.S. House of Representatives for one congressional district. House members vote on federal laws and must start all tax and spending bills. King County is split among four districts; only voters in this district vote in this race.
A member of the U.S. House of Representatives for one congressional district. House members vote on federal laws and must start all tax and spending bills. King County is split among four districts; only voters in this district vote in this race.
A seat on the Washington Supreme Court, the state's highest court. The race is nonpartisan.
A seat on the Washington Supreme Court, the state's highest court. The race is nonpartisan.
A seat on the Washington Supreme Court, the state's highest court. The race is nonpartisan.
A seat on the Washington Supreme Court, the state's highest court. The race is nonpartisan.
A seat on the Washington Supreme Court, the state's highest court. The race is nonpartisan.

Todd Bloom is an attorney, certified public accountant, financial planner, and Navy Veteran running for the Washington State Supreme Court, Position 7.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
A member of the Washington State Senate. State senators write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
A member of the Washington State Senate. State senators write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
A member of the Washington State Senate. State senators write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A member of the Washington State Senate. State senators write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A member of the Washington State Senate. State senators write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
A member of the Washington State Senate. State senators write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
A member of the Washington State Senate. State senators write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.

I am not seeking name recognition; I am here to serve my constituents and the State of Washington.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
A member of the Washington State Senate. State senators write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A member of the Washington State Senate. State senators write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
A member of the Washington State Senate. State senators write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
A member of the Washington State Senate. State senators write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A member of the Washington State Senate. State senators write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
One of two members of the Washington House of Representatives from this legislative district. Representatives write and vote on state laws and the state budget. Only voters in this legislative district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
Prosecutes crimes in King County on behalf of the state and serves as the lawyer for county government. The race is nonpartisan.
Sets the value of property in King County, which is used to calculate property taxes. The race is nonpartisan.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
Runs elections in King County, including voter registration, ballots and counting votes. The race is nonpartisan.
One of nine members of the King County Council, which sets the county budget and passes county laws. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this council district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
One of nine members of the King County Council, which sets the county budget and passes county laws. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this council district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
One of nine members of the King County Council, which sets the county budget and passes county laws. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this council district vote in this race.
One of nine members of the King County Council, which sets the county budget and passes county laws. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this council district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A seat on the Washington Court of Appeals, which hears appeals from trial courts. Division 1, District 1 covers King County. The race is nonpartisan.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A seat on the Washington Court of Appeals, which hears appeals from trial courts. Division 1, District 1 covers King County. The race is nonpartisan.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of King County District Court, which hears misdemeanor and traffic cases, small claims and smaller civil cases. The race is nonpartisan. Only voters in this electoral district vote in this race.
A seat on the Seattle City Council, which passes city laws and the city budget. This election fills the last year of the term. Only Seattle voters in District 5 vote in this race.

Nilu Jenks is the Political and Partnerships Director at FairVote Washington, and she is a dedicated community advocate committed to building a more representative, inclusive, and participatory democracy.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of Seattle Municipal Court, which hears misdemeanors and traffic and parking cases in Seattle. The race is nonpartisan. Only Seattle voters vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of Seattle Municipal Court, which hears misdemeanors and traffic and parking cases in Seattle. The race is nonpartisan. Only Seattle voters vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of Seattle Municipal Court, which hears misdemeanors and traffic and parking cases in Seattle. The race is nonpartisan. Only Seattle voters vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of Seattle Municipal Court, which hears misdemeanors and traffic and parking cases in Seattle. The race is nonpartisan. Only Seattle voters vote in this race.
A judge of Seattle Municipal Court, which hears misdemeanors and traffic and parking cases in Seattle. The race is nonpartisan. Only Seattle voters vote in this race.

Gabe has lived on Capitol Hill since 2003.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of Seattle Municipal Court, which hears misdemeanors and traffic and parking cases in Seattle. The race is nonpartisan. Only Seattle voters vote in this race.
Unopposed Only one candidate is certified for this race.
A judge of Seattle Municipal Court, which hears misdemeanors and traffic and parking cases in Seattle. The race is nonpartisan. Only Seattle voters vote in this race.
Official ballot wording
Initiative Measure No. IP26-645 concerns state and local taxes. This measure would repeal a 9.9% tax on annual individual income over $1,000,000; prohibit taxes measured by individual income and taxes on individual income or the receipt of individual income; and define “income.” This measure would decrease funding for public K-12 education, higher education (including universities and community colleges), and human services (primarily healthcare).
Should this measure be enacted into law?
Choices: Yes / No
A YES vote (Yes): Repeals the 9.9% tax on annual individual income over $1,000,000 and prohibits state and local taxes on or measured by individual income.
A NO vote (No): The measure does not become law.
To pass: Simple majority.
Official ballot wording
Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 concerns parental rights relating to their children in public school.
This measure would repeal amendments to a statute listing certain rights of parents and guardians of public-school children and re-enact the law as it was originally enacted by Initiative to the Legislature 2081.
Should this measure be enacted into law?
Choices: Yes / No
A YES vote (Yes): Repeals the amendments to the state law listing parents’ and guardians’ rights regarding public-school children and restores the law as originally enacted by Initiative 2081.
A NO vote (No): The measure does not become law.
To pass: Simple majority.
Official ballot wording
Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 concerns participation in athletics at K-12 schools.
This measure would prohibit students it defines as “biologically male” from competing in certain school athletic activities intended for female students only. It would require verification of biological sex by students’ healthcare providers.
Should this measure be enacted into law?
Choices: Yes / No
A YES vote (Yes): Prohibits students the measure defines as “biologically male” from competing in certain school athletic activities intended for female students only, and requires verification of biological sex by students’ healthcare providers.
A NO vote (No): The measure does not become law.
To pass: Simple majority.
Official ballot wording
The Bothell City Council adopted Resolution No. 1784, approving annexation into the Shoreline Fire Department Regional Fire Authority and related plan amendment. To maintain current fire and emergency medical service levels and provide long-term financial and operational sustainability for such services within Bothell, should Bothell be annexed into and become a part of the Shoreline Fire Department Regional Fire Authority, effective March 1, 2027, pursuant to the plan amendment, as provided in Resolution No. 1784?
Choices: Yes / No
A YES vote (Yes): Bothell joins the Shoreline Fire Department Regional Fire Authority on March 1, 2027, for fire and emergency medical services.
A NO vote (No): Bothell does not join the regional fire authority.
To pass: Simple majority (RCW 52.26.300).
From the official explanatory statement: The Bothell City Council adopted Resolution 1784 requesting voter approval to annex into and become part of the Shoreline Fire Department Regional Fire Authority ("RFA"). As the region has grown and costs have increased, Bothell has considered governance/service models for fire and emergency medical services (“EMS”). As part of its study, Bothell contracted with the RFA for fire administration (Fire Chief) services.
Official ballot wording
To fund public safety and land use services, and to remain an independent city, the Clyde Hill City Council passed Resolution No. 725 proposing an increase to its regular property tax levy from approximately $0.30 to $0.50 per $1,000 of assessed valuation for 2027 with 3% annual increases to the annual limit factor for 2028-2036. Exemptions apply to seniors, veterans, and disabled persons who qualify under RCW 84.36.381.
Should this proposition be approved?
Choices: Yes / No
A YES vote (Yes): Raises Clyde Hill's regular property tax from about $0.30 to $0.50 per $1,000 of assessed value for 2027, with 3% annual limit increases for 2028 to 2036, to fund public safety and land use services. Qualifying seniors, veterans and disabled persons are exempt.
A NO vote (No): Clyde Hill's property tax levy stays under current limits.
To pass: Simple majority (RCW 84.55.050).
From the official explanatory statement: Clyde Hill Resolution No. 725 asks voters to increase the City’s portion of property taxes to pay for police, fire, emergency medical services, 911 dispatch, land use, and zoning services. Clyde Hill has the third lowest levy rate in King County, receiving less than $0.05 of every $1.00 paid in property taxes.
Official ballot wording
The Issaquah City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3142, concerning bonds for parks, trails, and recreation projects.
If approved, this proposition would authorize the City to: complete various projects, including sports fields and courts, new trails, trailhead improvements, restoration of Confluence Park’s Ek House, playground improvements, a new dog park, and related capital improvements; issue no more than $18,000,000 of general obligation bonds maturing within 20 years; and levy annual excess property taxes to pay and retire such bonds, all as provided in Ordinance No. 3142.
Should this proposition be approved?
Choices: Yes / No
A YES vote (Yes): Lets the city issue up to $18 million in bonds over up to 20 years, repaid by property taxes, for sports fields and courts, trails, restoring the Ek House, playgrounds, a dog park and related projects.
A NO vote (No): The bonds are not issued.
To pass: 60% majority and minimum turnout of 40% of voters casting ballots in last general election (Washington Constitution, art. VII, sec. 2(b)).
From the official explanatory statement: The City of Issaquah is proposing to issue up to $18 million of bonds for various park, trail, and recreation projects. If approved by voters, these park bonds would replace the City’s retiring park bonds and mature 20 years after they are issued.
Official ballot wording
Kenmore City Council passed Ordinance 26-0644 regarding funding for programing and services. To fund Climate & Environmental Stewardship, Affordable Housing, and Human Services, this proposition increases Kenmore’s maximum regular property tax levy rate to $1.25/$1,000 for collection in 2027; sets the limit factor for Kenmore’s regular property tax levy increases in 2028-2032 to 6%; authorizes the 2032 levy amount as the basis to calculate subsequent levies (RCW 84.55); and exempts qualifying seniors, veterans, and others (RCW 84.36).
Should this proposition be approved?
Choices: Yes / No
A YES vote (Yes): Raises Kenmore's maximum regular property tax rate to $1.25 per $1,000 of assessed value for 2027 and allows increases of up to 6% a year in 2028 to 2032, to fund climate and environmental stewardship, affordable housing and human services. Qualifying seniors, veterans and others are exempt.
A NO vote (No): Kenmore's property tax levy stays under current limits.
To pass: Simple majority (RCW 84.55.050).
From the official explanatory statement: The City of Kenmore seeks voter approval to increase the City’s regular property tax levy up to $1.25 per $1,000 of assessed value to fund programs and services for Climate & Environmental Stewardship, Affordable Housing, and Human Services.
Official ballot wording
The City Council of the City of Lake Forest Park adopted Resolution No. 26-2084 to fund Public Safety Services.
This proposition would fund Public Safety Services per the Resolution including police services, safety equipment, 911 dispatch, emergency management services, jail services, and mental health crisis response by temporarily setting the maximum total regular levy rate at $0.88920/$1,000 for collection in 2027, with annual increases for five years based on inflation (Seattle region CPI-U). Qualifying low-income seniors, disabled veterans, and other disabled persons are exempt under RCW 84.36.381.
Should this proposition be approved?
Choices: Yes / No
A YES vote (Yes): Sets Lake Forest Park's maximum regular property tax rate at $0.88920 per $1,000 of assessed value for 2027, rising with inflation for five years, to fund police, 911 dispatch, jail, emergency management and mental health crisis response. Qualifying low-income seniors and disabled persons are exempt.
A NO vote (No): The city's property tax levy stays under current limits.
To pass: Simple majority (RCW 84.55.050).
From the official explanatory statement: The City of Lake Forest Park proposes Proposition 1 to provide sustainable funding for Public Safety Services including: police staffing, training, and safety equipment; 911 dispatch services; jail services; prosecution and public defense costs; and crisis intervention and mental health response programs.
Official ballot wording
The Milton City Council adopted Resolution 26-2005 concerning a proposition to maintain funding for police services and public safety. If approved, this proposition would increase the sales and use tax rate by one-tenth of one percent (0.001) to provide ongoing funding for public safety purposes permitted under RCW 82.14.450, such as providing adequate law enforcement staffing levels. This increase would become effective in 2027.
Should this proposition be approved?
Choices: Yes / No
A YES vote (Yes): Raises Milton’s sales tax by 0.1% starting in 2027 to fund public safety, such as police staffing.
A NO vote (No): The sales tax is not raised.
Official ballot wording
The City Council of the City of SeaTac passed Ordinance No. 26-1017 concerning funding for public safety and other City services. If approved, this proposition would increase the City’s sales and use tax rate by 1/10th of 1% (0.1%) to provide funding for public safety services, including but not limited to, fire protection, fire prevention and emergency medical response; law enforcement support and staffing and retention; criminal justice purposes; public safety operations, maintenance and capital; and other public safety operations and services authorized under RCW 82.14.450. Should this proposition be approved?
Choices: Yes / No
A YES vote (Yes): Raises SeaTac's sales tax by 0.1% to fund public safety, including fire protection, emergency medical response and law enforcement.
A NO vote (No): The sales tax is not raised.
To pass: Simple majority (RCW 82.14.450).
From the official explanatory statement: The City of SeaTac provides public safety and related services directly and through contracts with the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority and King County Sheriff’s Office. These services support residents and thousands of people who travel to SeaTac daily to access local hotels, restaurants, businesses, employment opportunities, and the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, located entirely within the City.
Official ballot wording
The City of Seattle adopted Ordinance No. 127474 concerning funding for transit service and related transportation needs in Seattle.
The City of Seattle’s Proposition 1 would dedicate funding to transit services benefiting Seattle residents, including more frequent service; affordable fare programs for qualifying individuals; reliability, access, and climate projects; enhanced service on RapidRide and routes serving regional centers and high equity priority areas; facilitation of Sound Transit expansion; and others as provided in Ordinance 127474. It authorizes a 0.3% sales and use tax for up to ten years to replace the current voter-approved 0.15% sales tax expiring March 31, 2027.
Should this Proposition be approved?
Choices: Yes / No
A YES vote (Yes): Approves a 0.3% sales tax for up to ten years for transit service in Seattle, replacing the current 0.15% transit sales tax that expires March 31, 2027.
A NO vote (No): The new tax is not approved. The current 0.15% tax expires March 31, 2027.
To pass: Simple Majority (RCW 36.73.065(1)).
From the official explanatory statement: In 2020, Ordinance 126250 enacted a 0.15 percent, six-year sales and use tax for transportation purposes. The tax was enacted under authority granted to the City by Seattle voters in approving Ordinance 126115. The tax expires March 31, 2027.
Official ballot wording
The Shoreline City Council adopted Resolution No. 562 concerning the creation of a metropolitan park district in Shoreline.
This proposition would create the Shoreline Metropolitan Park District to finance and refinance the acquisition, construction, operation, maintenance, programming, renovation, and expansion of a pool facility and future recreational facilities. The District, with the same boundaries as Shoreline, governed by a Board composed of City Councilmembers, would exercise powers in state law, provide ongoing funding, levy regular property taxes not to exceed $0.75/$1,000 assessed valuation (anticipated initial rate $0.55/$1,000, or as necessary to generate approximately $8.8 million annually).
Should the Shoreline Metropolitan Park District be formed?
Choices: For the formation of a Shoreline Metropolitan Park District to be governed by Shoreline City Councilmembers. / Against the formation of a Shoreline Metropolitan Park District.
A YES vote (For the formation of a Shoreline Metropolitan Park District to be governed by Shoreline City Councilmembers.): Creates the Shoreline Metropolitan Park District, governed by the Shoreline City Council. It could levy property taxes of up to $0.75 per $1,000 of assessed value (expected to start at $0.55) to build, run and maintain a pool and future recreation facilities.
A NO vote (Against the formation of a Shoreline Metropolitan Park District.): The park district is not created and this new property tax is not levied.
To pass: Simple majority (RCW 35.61.040).
From the official explanatory statement: If approved by voters, this proposition creates the Shoreline Metropolitan Park District (MPD) to finance and refinance the construction, operation, and maintenance of a new indoor pool facility and potential future recreational facilities. The MPD would have the same boundaries as the City of Shoreline (City). The MPD would be a new taxing jurisdiction (RCW 35.61) governed by a board composed of City Councilmembers. City staff would operate and maintain the pool pursuant to an agreement with the MPD.
Official ballot wording
The Board of Directors of Auburn School District No. 408 has approved Resolution No. 1426, concerning a proposition to finance construction of new and replacement schools. This proposition would authorize the District to provide funds to construct a new Middle School and replace Cascade Middle School and Alpac Elementary, to increase capacity and reduce class sizes, modernize technology and learning environments, improve safety and security, and renovate playfields for student and community use, by issuing up to $491,000,000 of general obligation bonds maturing within 20 years, and levying annual excess property taxes to repay the bonds, as the resolution provides.
Should this proposition be:
Choices: Approved / Rejected
A YES vote (Approved): Lets the district issue up to $491 million in bonds over up to 20 years, repaid by property taxes, to build a new middle school, replace Cascade Middle School and Alpac Elementary, and make other improvements.
A NO vote (Rejected): The bonds are not issued.
To pass: 60% yes vote and a minimum turnout of 40% of voters casting ballots in last general election (Washington Constitution, art. VII, sec. 2(b)).
From the official explanatory statement: Passage of Proposition 1 enables Auburn School District to finance the construction of new and replacement schools by issuing up to $491,000,000 of general obligation bonds. If voters approve this proposition, the District will use the bond proceeds to (1) construct and equip a new Middle School #5, (2) construct and equip a new middle school with enlarged capacity to replace Cascade Middle School, and (3) construct and equip a new elementary school with enlarged capacity to replace Alpac Elementary School. These projects will increase school capacity, reduce class sizes and the use of portable classrooms, improve safety and security, modernize technology and student learning environments, improve energy efficiency, and improve and expand playfields and athletic facilities for student and community use.
Official ballot wording
The Board of Directors of Highline School District No. 401 adopted Resolution No. 11-26, concerning neighborhood school improvements and safety upgrades. This proposition would authorize the District to: replace or rebuild four deteriorating schools (Cascade, Chinook, Sylvester, CHOICE Academy), including new career/technical learning spaces, secure entrances, security camera upgrades; make critical districtwide core building system upgrades, including heating, roofing, electrical, plumbing; implement districtwide health, security, fire system and earthquake safety upgrades; issue $595,400,000 of general obligation bonds maturing within 21 years; and levy annual excess property taxes to repay the bonds, all as provided in Resolution No. 11-26. Should this proposition be:
Choices: Approved / Rejected
A YES vote (Approved): Lets the district issue $595.4 million in bonds over up to 21 years, repaid by property taxes, to replace or rebuild Cascade, Chinook, Sylvester and CHOICE Academy and make districtwide building and safety upgrades.
A NO vote (Rejected): The bonds are not issued.
To pass: 60% majority and minimum turnout of 40% of voters casting ballots in last general election (Washington Constitution, art. VII, sec. 2(b)).
From the official explanatory statement: Proposition 1 authorizes school construction bonds to replace and rebuild deteriorating schools and make districtwide safety and accessibility improvements and upgrades. Proposition 1 will improve student, staff and community safety, security and accessibility, enhance student learning environments, improve and expand educational opportunities, and provide necessary student educational facilities (including career/technical learning spaces).
Official ballot wording
The Board of Directors of Highline School District No. 401 adopted Resolution No. 12-26, concerning educational technology and capital improvements to maintain student learning. This proposition would fund districtwide technology, programs and staff and other capital improvements not funded by the State, including cybersecurity protections, reliable internet, technology operations and infrastructure, and student/staff technology access, and authorize the District to levy the following excess taxes on all taxable property within the District:
Collection year, levy rate and amount: 2027: $0.36 per $1,000, $12,000,000; 2028: $0.35 per $1,000, $12,000,000; 2029: $0.34 per $1,000, $12,000,000; 2030: $0.32 per $1,000, $12,000,000.
all as provided in Resolution No. 12-26. Should this proposition be approved?
Choices: Yes / No
A YES vote (Yes): Approves a property tax levy of $12 million a year for 2027 through 2030 (estimated $0.32 to $0.36 per $1,000 of assessed value) for technology and other capital improvements.
A NO vote (No): This levy is not collected.
To pass: Simple majority (Wash. Const. art. VII, sec. 2(a)).
From the official explanatory statement: Proposition 2 authorizes a capital levy for educational technology and capital improvements to maintain student learning and improve student and staff safety and security. Proposition 2 will address the existing condition of educational technology equipment, infrastructure and systems and aging and educationally outdated school facilities.
Official ballot wording
The Board of Directors of Kent School District No. 415 adopted Resolution No. 1718 concerning a proposition to support educational programs and operations expenses. If approved, this proposition would authorize the District to levy the following excess taxes, replacing an expiring levy, on all taxable property within the District, to support educational programs and operations not funded by the State’s statutory program of basic education.
Collection year, levy rate and amount: 2028: $1.95 per $1,000, $104,700,000; 2029: $1.93 per $1,000, $111,100,000; 2030: $1.88 per $1,000, $115,700,000; 2031: $1.84 per $1,000, $121,400,000.
Should this proposition be approved?
Choices: Yes / No
A YES vote (Yes): Replaces the district's expiring levy with property taxes of $104.7 million to $121.4 million a year for 2028 through 2031 (about $1.84 to $1.95 per $1,000 of assessed value) for programs and operations the state does not fund.
A NO vote (No): The replacement levy is not collected. The current levy expires as scheduled.
To pass: Simple majority (Wash. Const. art. VII, sec. 2(a)).
From the official explanatory statement: Passage of Proposition 1 would allow Kent School District to replace an expiring voter-approved levy for school programs and operations by levying $104,700,000 for collection in 2028, $111,100,000 for collection in 2029, $115,700,000 for collection in 2030, and $121,400,000 for collection in 2031. The proposed levy would replace an existing levy that voters previously approved and expires in 2027. The expiring levy currently funds approximately 15% of the District’s general operating expenses. If approved, the proposed replacement levy would pay for day-to-day school operations to meet student needs not funded by the State, including but not limited to college and career readiness staff and programs, physical, social, and emotional learning staff and programs (including mental health counselors and staff), materials, supplies, and operational costs (including utilities and insurance), transportation, safety and security staff, athletic and extra-curricular programs, electives, and classroom support programs.
Official ballot wording
To support operational expenses, modernize and maintain burial records, acquire essential equipment, advance the development of green burial practices, and facilitate the acquisition of additional property, the Board of King County Cemetery District No. 1 adopted Resolution No. 295 proposing a permanent increase in its regular property tax levy from approximately $.03 ($.02816) to $.05 per $1000 of assessed valuation beginning in 2027.
Should this proposition be:
Choices: Approved / Rejected
A YES vote (Approved): Permanently raises the cemetery district's property tax from about $0.03 to $0.05 per $1,000 of assessed value starting in 2027, for Vashon Cemetery operations, records, equipment, green burial and more land.
A NO vote (Rejected): The levy is not raised.
To pass: Simple majority (RCW 84.55.050).
From the official explanatory statement: This measure concerns the continued stewardship and preservation of the Vashon Cemetery. The cemetery serves as the final resting place for generations of island residents and is a significant historical and community resource. Funds generated by this measure would support routine maintenance, preservation of cemetery records, repair and upkeep of facilities, and protection of the site's historical character to help ensure that the cemetery remains safe, accessible, and well maintained, while preserving its role as a place of remembrance and reflection for current and future generations. The measure does not change ownership or governance of the cemetery. An increase of two cents per $1000 of assessed valuation results in an annual property tax increase, per $100,000 of assessed property tax value, of two dollars per year. If approved, the property tax levy increase would result in a total levy of five dollars ($5.00) per $100,000 of assessed value.
Official ballot wording
The Board of Fire Commissioners of King County Fire Protection District No. 20 adopted Resolution No. 2026-002, concerning emergency response facilities to protect public health, life and property. This proposition would authorize the District to: improve emergency response support facilities and infrastructure on two sites owned by the District; renovate and modernize the existing fire station; acquire firefighting and emergency response apparatus; issue no more than $16,000,000 of general obligation bonds maturing within 20 years; and levy annual excess property taxes to repay the bonds, all as provided in Resolution No. 2026-002. Should this proposition be:
Choices: Approved / Rejected
A YES vote (Approved): Lets the fire district issue up to $16 million in bonds over up to 20 years, repaid by property taxes, to improve two district sites, renovate the fire station and buy fire and emergency vehicles and equipment.
A NO vote (Rejected): The bonds are not issued.
To pass: 60% majority and minimum turnout of 40% of voters casting ballots in last general election (Washington Constitution, art. VII, sec. 2(b)).
From the official explanatory statement: King County Fire Protection District No. 20 provides fire suppression and rescue services, emergency medical services, and fire prevention and community education to protect life and property from the adverse effects of fires, medical emergencies or exposure to dangerous conditions.
Ballots are mailed to every registered voter starting Friday, Oct. 16.
Every voter gets a ballot in the mail. Fill it out at home, sign the return envelope, and send it back by mail (no stamp needed) or put it in any King County ballot drop box. Vote centers help people register, replace a ballot, or vote with accessible equipment.
Tuesday, Nov. 3. Mailed ballots must be postmarked by Election Day; the Postal Service recommends mailing at least one week early. Drop boxes close at 8 p.m. on Election Day.
Washington does not require a photo ID to return a mail ballot.
King County Elections: 206-296-VOTE (8683), elections@kingcounty.gov, 919 SW Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
Candidates appear as listed on the official candidate list; write-in candidates are not shown. Party labels are those on the ballot. Checked Oct. 4, 2026.
Are you a candidate? Send us your photo and biography.